Skip Navigation



Journal of Tropical Pediatrics Advance Access published online on January 12, 2006

Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, doi:10.1093/tropej/fmk005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
52/4/276    most recent
fmk005v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soliman, A. T.
Right arrow Articles by M AlGhobashy, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soliman, A. T.
Right arrow Articles by M AlGhobashy, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Original Papers

Glycaemic Control with Modified Intensive Insulin Injections (MII) Using Insulin Pens and Premixed Insulin in Children with Type-1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Ashraf T. Soliman 1 *, Magdi Omar 1, Mostafa M. Rizk 1, Ahmad El Awwa 1, and Fatma M AlGhobashy 1

1 Departments of Pediatrics and Clinical Pathology, Alexandria University Children's Hospital, El-Chatby, Alexandria, Egypt

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Ashraf T. Soliman, E-mail: ATSOLIMAN{at}yahoo.com


   Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare glycemic control and insulin dosage in children with type 1 diabetes treated by a modified intensified insulin therapy (MII) using insulin pens (and premixed and regular insulin) with those on conventional insulin therapy. This was a longitudinal, randomized controlled trial for 6 months or more. From a cohort of 125 children with previously diagnosed type-1 diabetes (more than a year after diagnosis) two groups were randomly selected Group AI (n=20) and Group B (n=20). Group AI children and 10 children with recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes (Group AII) were allocated to MII using regular insulin and premixed insulin (30/70 and 40/60 and 50/50). Group B patients continued their conventional insulin therapy for the whole period of the trial. The main outcome measures were glycemic control measured by mean blood glucose concentration and percentage of glycated haemoglobin and total daily insulin dose. Mean blood glucose concentrations before the three main meals, and at midnight, (148, 147, 179 and 127 mg/dl, respectively) were lower in children receiving intensified MII compared with those receiving conventional insulin therapy (192, 174, 194 and 179 mg/dl, respectively) (standardized mean difference 34±15 mg/dl), equivalent to a difference of 1.9±0.8 mmol/l. This improved control during MII was achieved with no change in the average daily insulin dose in group-AI. In group-AII insulin dose decreased significantly during their first 6 moths of treatment (honeymooning). Glycemic control is better during MII using insulin pens and premixed and regular insulin compared with conventional insulin therapy, without any significant change in insulin dose needed to achieve this level of control. The difference in glycemic control between the two methods is significant and could reduce the risk of micro-vascular complications.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
W Crasto, J Jarvis, K Khunti, and M J Davies
New insulins and new insulin regimens: a review of their role in improving glycaemic control in patients with diabetes
Postgrad. Med. J., May 1, 2009; 85(1003): 257 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.