Skip Navigation



Journal of Tropical Pediatrics Advance Access published online on April 14, 2005

Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, doi:10.1093/tropej/fmh100
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
51/3/174    most recent
fmh100v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karande, S.
Right arrow Articles by De, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karande, S.
Right arrow Articles by De, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press 2005; all rights reserved

Original Papers

Concurrent Outbreak of Leptospirosis and Dengue in Mumbai, India, 2002

Sunil Karande 1*, Dipak Gandhi 1, Madhuri Kulkarni 1, Renu Bharadwaj 2, Sae Pol 2, Jyotsna Thakare 3, and Anuradha De 4

1 Departments of Paediatrics, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College & General Hospital, Mumbai, India
2 Regional Reference Laboratory for Leptospirosis, Department of Microbiology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Medical College & Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune, India
3 WHO Collaborating Centre for Arbovirus and Haemorrhagic Fever Reference and Research, National Institute of Virology, Pune, India
4 Microbiology, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College & General Hospital, Mumbai, India

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sunil Karande, E-mail: karandesunil{at}yahoo.com


   Abstract

This prospective study was undertaken to investigate the possibility of a concurrent outbreak of leptospirosis and dengue and to describe the clinical illnesses. From 20 June to 14 November 2002, children who presented to our hospital with a suspected diagnosis of leptospirosis or dengue were admitted. In every child with suspected leptospirosis, a screening latex agglutination test was carried out to detect anti-Leptospira antibodies. The diagnosis of leptospirosis was confirmed by a positive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test or microagglutination test. The diagnosis of dengue was confirmed by a positive IgM antibody capture ELISA test. Clinical features in the leptospirosis and leptospirosis-negative groups, and dengue and dengue-negative groups were analysed. Of 90 children screened, 15 (16.7 per cent) had leptospirosis. Two children with Weil's disease died and the remaining 13 responded well to intravenous penicillin. Five clinical features were significantly associated with leptospirosis, namely conjunctival suffusion (p = 0.007), haemorrhage (p = 0.020), abdominal pain (p = 0.011), hepatosplenomegaly (p = 0.044), and oedema (p = 0.007). As the number of these five features concomitantly present increased, the chances of the child having leptospirosis also increased significantly (p < 0.0001). Of 90 children screened, 16 (17.8 per cent) had dengue. All responded well to the treatment and went home. Two clinical features were significantly associated with dengue, namely arthralgia (p = 0.020) and thrombocytopenia (p = 0.001). If both these features were present, the chances of the child having dengue increased significantly (p = 0.001). Our study shows that a concurrent outbreak of leptospirosis and dengue had occurred in the slums of Mumbai city.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.