Skip Navigation

Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 2002 48(4):227-233; doi:10.1093/tropej/48.4.227
© 2002 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Avent, M.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, V. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Avent, M.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, V. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

A Comparison of High versus Low Dose Recombinant Human Erythropoietin versus Blood Transfusion in the Management of Anaemia of Prematurity in a Developing Country

M. Avent1, B. J. Cory2, J. Galpin3, D. E. Ballot2, P. A. Cooper2, G. Sherman3 and V. A. Davies4

1 Department of Pharmacy, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa 2 Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Johannesburg Hospital and University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa 3 Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa 4 Department of Haematology and Molecular Medicine, South African Institute of Medical Research and University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of early treatment with erythropoietin (EPO) in two different treatment regimes (high vs. low dose) in comparison to the conventional treatment of packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusions in the management of anaemia of prematurity in a country with limited resources. An open controlled trial was conducted on 93 preterm infants (7 days postnatal age, 900–1500 g birthweight). Patients were randomly assigned either to a low dose (250 IU/kg), a high dose (400 IU/kg), or a control group. EPO was administered subcutaneously three times a week and all infants received 6 mg/kg iron orally from study entry to endpoint of therapy. Haematological parameters were measured and compared. The success was defined as an absence of transfusions and a haematocrit that did not fall below 30 per cent during the time period that the infants were in the study. The three groups were statistically comparable at study entry with respect to gestational age, birthweight, Apgar scores, and haematological values. Over the period that the infants were in the study, 75 per cent of the low dose group and 71 per cent of the high dose group met the criteria for success compared with 40 per cent in the control group (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the number of transfusions when the low and high EPO dose groups (9.5 per cent) were combined and compared with the control group (26.7 per cent) p = 0.0587. It was concluded that in stable infants, 900–1500 g, where phlebotomy losses are minimized and stringent transfusion guidelines are adhered to, EPO does not significantly decrease the number of transfusions. A conservative approach in the management of anaemia of prematurity, is a viable alternative in areas with limited resources.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.