Skip Navigation

Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 1998 44(2):104-108; doi:10.1093/tropej/44.2.104
© 1998 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Narang, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kumar, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Narang, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kumar, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


research-article

Epidemiology of Systemic Candidiasis in a Tertiary Care Neonatal Unit

Anil Narang, MD, Pankaj B. Agrawal, DM, A. Chakrabarti, MD and Praveen Kumar, DM

Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics and Department of Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute Medical Education and Research Chandigarh, India

Correspondence: Dr Anil Nararang, MD, Additional Professor, Dept of Pediatncs, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India. Tel. 0172 715678

143 neonates were diagnosed to have acquired systemic candidiasis out of a total 4530 admissions (3.2 per cent) to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) during a period of 61/2 years from January 1990 to June 1996. Mean age at onset was 10.4 days, mean birth weight 1454g, and mean gestation was 31.7 weeks. Ninety-four per cent were premature, 95 per cent low birth weight (LBW), and all had undergone peripheral vein catheterization and had received broad spectrum antibiotics, except one, prior to the diagnosis. Fifty-eight per cent were ventilated and 15 per cent received parenteral nutrition. Persistent/recurrent pneumonia, apnoea, lethargy, high gastric aspirates, and abdominal distension were the common clinical manifestations. Candida tropicalis, C. albicans, and C. guillermondii were the most common isolates. Blood and urine were the predominant sites for isolation of Candida. Fluconazole was the most used antifungal agent, with 24 per cent resistance against it. Fifty per cent of babies died due to all causes. Of all the deaths, two-thirds were Candida related. Candida-attributabie deaths occurred in 24 cases (17 per cent).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
D. Kaufman and K. D. Fairchild
Clinical Microbiology of Bacterial and Fungal Sepsis in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., July 1, 2004; 17(3): 638 - 680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
D. K. Benjamin Jr, E. R. DeLong, W. J. Steinbach, C. M. Cotton, T. J. Walsh, and R. H. Clark
Empirical Therapy for Neonatal Candidemia in Very Low Birth Weight Infants
Pediatrics, September 1, 2003; 112(3): 543 - 547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
E. Roilides, E. Farmaki, J. Evdoridou, A. Francesconi, M. Kasai, J. Filioti, M. Tsivitanidou, D. Sofianou, G. Kremenopoulos, and T. J. Walsh
Candida tropicalis in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Epidemiologic and Molecular Analysis of an Outbreak of Infection with an Uncommon Neonatal Pathogen
J. Clin. Microbiol., February 1, 2003; 41(2): 735 - 741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
I. R. Makhoul, I. Kassis, T. Smolkin, A. Tamir, and P. Sujov
Review of 49 Neonates With Acquired Fungal Sepsis: Further Characterization
Pediatrics, January 1, 2001; 107(1): 61 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.