Skip Navigation

Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 1994 40(3):133-136; doi:10.1093/tropej/40.3.133
© 1994 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laurell, L.
Right arrow Articles by Liljestrand, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laurell, L.
Right arrow Articles by Liljestrand, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


research-article

A Study of the Use of the Nicaraguan Antenatal Card

Louise Laurell*, Birgitta Essén, MD**, Rodolfo Peña, MD, MPH***, Per-Olof Östergren, MD,PhD{dagger} and Jerker Liljestrand, MD, PhD{dagger}{dagger},

*Department of Pediatrics, Lund Hospital Sweden
**Primary Health Care, Växjö Hospital Sweden
***Preventive Medicine, Leon University Nicaragua
{dagger}Community Health Sciences, Lund Univerity, Malmo General Hospital Sweden
{dagger}{dagger}Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Karlskrona Hospital Sweden

Correspondence: Jerker Liljestrand, Muraregatan 20c, S-371 38 Karlskrona, Sweden

The present study describes the use of a home-based antenatal card in a sample of 120 consecutive women who were giving birth at a large teaching hospital in the city of León, Nicaragua. Information was obtained by interviews with the women before leaving hospital and all data on their antenatal cards and regardingdelivery outcome were analysed. Antenatal care attendance by the 120 women was 93 per cent, and 86 per cent had received an antenatal card. However, only in 33 per cent of the cases had the card been adequately used: inappropriate handling in hospital was the commonest cause of non-use. Suggestions for a revision of the card are presented in the companion article, in which we also stress the importance of continuous training of the health personnel.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.