Skip Navigation

Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 1989 35(6):315-320; doi:10.1093/tropej/35.6.315
© 1989 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reichenheim, M.
Right arrow Articles by Harpham, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reichenheim, M.
Right arrow Articles by Harpham, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


research-article

Child Health in a Brazilian Squatter Settlement: Acute Infections and Associated Risk Factors

Michael Reichenheim*, and Trudy Harpham**

*Instituto de Medicina Social {Departamento de Epidemiologia), Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro Brasil
**Evaluation and Planning Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine UK

Correspondence: Dr Michael E. Reichenheim, Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Medicina Social,Rua São Francisco Xavier 524/7° Andar, 20550—Rio de Janeiro—RJ, Brasil

As a response to the need for more information about health problems in poor urban communities, a health survey was conducted in Rocinha, the largest squatter settlement, or favela, in Rio de Janeiro. A fifteen-day recall period was used to measure gastro-intestinal disorders, acute respiratory infections, and infections of the throat/ears/eyes in 600 children under 5 years of age. The respective prevalence of the three categories was 44, 79, and 14 per cent Taking only severe episodes into account, the prevalence was 4, 12, and 2.5 per cent, respectively. Risk factors, such as household income and environmental conditions (socioeconomic status), migration status, maternal stress, magnitude of separation between child and mother, and age of child, are examined and implications of positive associations are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.