Skip Navigation



Journal of Tropical Pediatrics Advance Access published online on April 24, 2009

Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, doi:10.1093/tropej/fmp027
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mauta, L.
Right arrow Articles by Ripa, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mauta, L.
Right arrow Articles by Ripa, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Brief Report

Comparison of the Use of Liquid Crystal Thermometers with Glass Mercury Thermometers in Febrile Children in a Children's Ward at Port Moresby General Hospital, Papua New Guinea

L. Mautaa, J. Vinceb and P. Ripac

a Paediatric Department, Port Moresby General Hospital, Papua New Guinea
b Discipline of Child Health, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Papua New Guinea, Papua New Guinea
c Medical Education Unit, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Papua New Guinea, Papua New Guinea

Correspondence: J. Vince, Division of Clinical Sciences, PO Box 5623, Boroko, Papua New Guinea. E-mail <johndvince{at}gmail.com>.


   Abstract

We compared the temperatures recorded, in febrile children admitted to a children's ward at Port Moresby General Hospital, by a doctor and by a group of nurses using glass mercury thermometers (GMT) and liquid crystal thermometers (LCT, NextempR and TraxitR). The mean difference (with 95% confidence intervals) in temperatures between GMT and NextempR were –0.12°C (–0.16°C to –0.08°C) for the doctor and 0.12°C (0.04–0.20°C) for nurses. The mean difference in temperatures between GMT and TraxitR were –0.05°C (–0.09°C to –0.01°C) for the doctor and 0.19°C (0.10–0.28°C) for the nurses. A similar result was obtained when one of the NextempR thermometers used in the initial study was compared with GMT on a small sample of patients by the doctor 8 months later. Limited evaluation showed nursing staff were in favour of using the LCTs. NextempR and TraxitR thermometers can be used interchangeably with GMT in this setting.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.