Skip Navigation



Journal of Tropical Pediatrics Advance Access published online on December 15, 2004

Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, doi:10.1093/tropej/fmh066
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
51/1/11    most recent
fmh066v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Partridge, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, V. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Partridge, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Davies, V. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, Vol. 0, No. 0 © Oxford University Press 2005; all rights reserved.

Article

Intensive Care for Very Low Birthweight Infants in South Africa: A Survey of Physician Attitudes, Parent Counseling and Resuscitation Practices

J. Colin Partridge 1*, Tushar M. Ranchod 1, Daynia E. Ballot 2, Alma M. Martinez 1, Barbara J. Cory 2, and Victor A. Davies 2

1 University of California San Francisco, Department of Pediatrics, San Francisco General Hospital, California, USA
2 University of Witwatersrand, Department of Paediatrics, Johannesburg General Hospital, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Colin Partridge, E-mail: cpartridge{at}sfghpeds.ucsf.edu


   Abstract

Improving outcomes have promoted utilization of intensive care for premature infants in developing countries with available fiscal and technological resources. Physician counseling and decision-making have not been characterized where economic restrictions, governmental guidelines, and physician cultural attitudes may influence decisions about the appropriateness of neonatal intensive care. A cross-sectional survey of all neonatologists and pediatricians providing neonatal care in public and private hospitals in South Africa (n = 394) was carried out. Physicians returned 93 surveys (24 per cent response rate). Frequency of counseling increased with increasing gestational age (GA) but was not universally provided at any GA. Morbidity and mortality were consistently discussed and fiscal considerations frequently discussed when antenatal counseling occurred. Resuscitation thresholds were 25-26 weeks and 665-685 g, and were higher in public than in private hospitals. Decisions to limit resuscitation were based more on expected outcome than on patients' wishes or economics. At 24-25 weeks, 91 per cent of physicians would not resuscitate despite parents' wishes; 93 per cent of physicians would resuscitate 28-29-week-old infants over parents' refusal. Parents expecting premature infants are not invariably counseled. In making life-support decisions, physicians consider infants' best interests and, less frequently, financial and emotional burdens. Thresholds for resuscitation and intensive care are higher in public hospitals, and higher than in developed countries. Physicians relegate parents to a passive role in life-support decisions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. C. Partridge, A. M. Martinez, H. Nishida, N.-Y. Boo, K. W. Tan, C.-Y. Yeung, J.-H. Lu, and V. Y.H. Yu
International Comparison of Care for Very Low Birth Weight Infants: Parents' Perceptions of Counseling and Decision-Making
Pediatrics, August 1, 2005; 116(2): e263 - e271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.