Skip Navigation


Journal of Tropical Pediatrics Advance Access originally published online on July 6, 2005
Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 2005 51(5):295-299; doi:10.1093/tropej/fmi017
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
51/5/295    most recent
fmi017v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aggarwal, A.
Right arrow Articles by Narang, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aggarwal, A.
Right arrow Articles by Narang, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2005]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Original Papers

Evaluation of Renal Functions in Asphyxiated Newborns

Anu Aggarwal, Praveen Kumar, Gurdev Chowdhary, Siddhartha Majumdar1 and Anil Narang1

Departments of Pediatrics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh-160012, India, 1 Departments of Experimental Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh-160012, India

Dr Praveen Kumar, Department of Pediatrics, PGIMER, Chandigarh-160012, India. E-mail <drpkumarpgi{at}rediffmail.com>.

Renal injury due to perinatal asphyxia has not been systematically evaluated. The available studies have used variable definitions, incomplete investigations and none had a control group. The aim of this study was to evaluate systematically the renal functions in severely asphyxiated newborns and to find if abnormal renal function tests can predict adverse outcome (death or neurologic abnormality at discharge). In a prospective case-control design, 25 inborn babies ≥34 weeks gestation having asphyxia (5 min Apgar ≤6 or needing resuscitation ≥5 min) were enrolled as ‘cases’. Simultaneously 25 gestation and weight matched babies with no asphyxia were enrolled as ‘controls’. Renal function tests, calculated renal indices using timed urine collections and excretion of ß2-microglobulin and N-acetyl-ß-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) were monitored in both the groups for first 4 days of life. Fourteen (56 per cent) asphyxiated babies had acute renal failure (ARF) as compared to 1 (4 per cent) control (p = 0.002). Blood urea and serum creatinine values were significantly higher in asphyxiated babies on day 4 but not on day 2. Renal failure index and FeNa were higher in asphyxiated babies on both day 2 and day 4, but creatinine clearance was not different. Urinary excretion of both ß2-microglobulin and NAG was higher in the asphyxiated babies on day 2 as well as day 4. Five minute Apgar ≤6 had the best sensitivity to predict renal failure. A combination of high serum creatinine and high blood urea had 100 per cent sensitivity and negative predictive value to predict adverse outcome while serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dl alone had the best specificity and positive predictive value. The renal parameters were however poorer predictors of adverse outcome in comparison to clinical markers like 5 min Apgar ≤3 and HIE stage II/III. Both glomerular and tubular involvement was seen commonly in babies with birth asphyxia. Clinical markers of asphyxia were better predictors of adverse outcome than renal function tests.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.