Skip Navigation

Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 2004 50(3):175-177; doi:10.1093/tropej/50.3.175
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by John, S.
Right arrow Articles by Joseph, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by John, S.
Right arrow Articles by Joseph, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Serological Response to Early Measles Vaccination

Sushil JohnA1, G. LalithaA1, Kuryan GeorgeA1, and Abraham JosephA1

A1 Community Health Department, Christian Medical College,Vellore,Tamil Nadu, India

This study compares the persistence of measles IgG antibody in 239 children vaccinated at 6–8 months of age with 76 children vaccinated after 8 months of age. Among the children vaccinated prior to 9 months, 49 per cent of the children between 16 and 44 months and 33 per cent of children over 54 months had levels of measles IgG antibody conventionally considered protective. Among the children older than 48 months, 67 per cent of children vaccinated before 9 months and 13 per cent of children vaccinated after 8 months had antibody levels below the conventionally accepted protective levels of 0.2 IU/ml. Older children had lower antibody levels than younger children. Measles immunization before 9 months with the standard titer Edmonston–Zagreb vaccine has not provided a large proportion of under-five children with protective levels of measles IgG antibody. A significant proportion of children vaccinated at the currently recommended age also had suboptimal levels. It is difficult to protect the majority of the measles-susceptible population with a single dose regardless of the immunization schedule used. A second dose of measles vaccine may be necessary to increase the herd immunity.


* Correspondence: Dr Kuryan George, Community Health Department, Christian Medical College, Vellore 632002, Tamil Nadu, India. E-mail <abraham{at}cmc.ernet.in/ kurien{at}cmcvellore.ac.in>.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
M. H. Arguelles, M. L. Orellana, A. A. Castello, G. A. Villegas, M. Masini, A. L. Belizan, S. Gonzalez Ayala, O. D. Vera, and G. Glikmann
Measles virus-specific antibody levels in individuals in Argentina who received a one-dose vaccine.
J. Clin. Microbiol., August 1, 2006; 44(8): 2733 - 2738.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.