Skip Navigation

Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 2004 50(2):82-89; doi:10.1093/tropej/50.2.82
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kauchali, S.
Right arrow Articles by Van den Broeck, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kauchali, S.
Right arrow Articles by Van den Broeck, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Local Beliefs about Childhood Diarrhoea: Importance for Healthcare and Research

Shuaib Kauchali1,2, Nigel Rollins1,2 and Jan Van den Broeck1,*,§

1 Africa Centre for Health and Population Studies, Mtubatuba, KwaZulu/Natal, South Africa 2 Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine, University of Natal, Durban, South Africa

The aim of this study was to describe perceptions and beliefs about childhood diarrhoea in a rural South African area. A further aim was to describe mismatches with medical concepts that may influence quality of diarrhoea care and validity of population-based diarrhoea research. This was a descriptive study carried out in a rural district of KwaZulu/Natal, South Africa. Using a validated ethnographic method information was compiled from semi-structured interviews, card sorting exercises, case histories, and focus group discussions with 29 caregivers in total. Description of locally perceived diarrhoea types, signs, symptoms, causes and actions taken were recorded.

Eleven ‘local types of diarrhoea’ were identified, which were classified into three categories: (A) natural causation, (B) supernatural causation, and (C) caused by ‘germs’ or change in diet. Conceptual mismatches included: (1) not all conditions with frequent or watery stools were perceived as diarrhoea; (2) hygiene was considered irrelevant in the causation of A and B; (3) signs of dehydration were not always attributed to loss of fluid; (4) medical care and oral rehydration therapy were considered useless in B; (5) potentially harmful treatments, such as herbal enemas, are always preferred in B, sometimes in A. These mismatches carry the potential to hamper health promotion, predispose to delayed and poor care and may lead to selection bias, under- and misreporting and poor compliance in research.

This study highlights the discrepancies in concepts between medically trained and local people regarding the nature of childhood diarrhoea, the rationale behind care-seeking behaviour, and what can be expected from proposed interventions. Taking these discrepancies into account is not only essential to programmatic success and continued support but also for epidemiological surveys.

* Correspondence: Dr J. Van den Broeck, Africa Centre for Health and Population Studies, P.O. Box 198 Mtubatuba 3935, South Africa. Tel. +27 35 5507546; Fax + 27 35 5507565. E-mail <jan.Broeck{at}mrc.ac.za>.<br>

§ Other members of the Child Health Group: M. B. Bennish, R. M. Bland, H. M. Coovadia, A. Coutsoudis, M. L. Newell, and G. Solarsh.<br>


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.