Skip Navigation

Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 2001 47(5):295-300; doi:10.1093/tropej/47.5.295
© 2001 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kabra, N. S.
Right arrow Articles by Udani, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kabra, N. S.
Right arrow Articles by Udani, R. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Correlation Between Clinical Diagnoses at the Time of Death and Autopsy Findings in Critically Sick Neonates at a Regional Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in India

Nandkishor S. Kabra1 and Rekha H. Udani1

1 Department of Neonatology, King Edward VII Memorial Hospital and University of Bombay, Bombay, India

This study was carried out to examine the correlation between clinical diagnoses at the time of death and autopsy findings in newborn babies who died in the regional Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of King Edward VII Memorial Hospital affiliated to Bombay University. A consecutive sample of 240 newborns that died during the study period constituted the study cohort. Of these 240 (172 born in the hospital and 68 born outside) newborns who died during the study period, 197 (82.1 per cent) had autopsies performed. The mean Rushton's score for all the autopsies was 307 ± 25.8 (range 300–400). There were 24 cases (12.2 per cent) where autopsy revealed a major finding (class I) that, if known prior to death, would have altered clinical management and could have resulted in cure or prolonged survival. In 53 patients (26.9 per cent) the autopsy revealed a major finding (class II) that, if known prior to death, would not have altered clinical management because specific therapy was unavailable or the patient had received appropriate therapy. It is concluded that a good quality autopsy continues to yield valuable and unsuspected information in a substantial number of newborn deaths.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
K. G. Shojania, E. C. Burton, K. M. McDonald, and L. Goldman
Changes in Rates of Autopsy-Detected Diagnostic Errors Over Time: A Systematic Review
JAMA, June 4, 2003; 289(21): 2849 - 2856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.