Skip Navigation

Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 1999 45(3):146-151; doi:10.1093/tropej/45.3.146
© 1999 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ako-Nai, K
Right arrow Articles by Onipede, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ako-Nai, K
Right arrow Articles by Onipede, M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The Bacteriology of Neonatal Septicaemia in Ile-Ife, Nigeria

K Ako-NaiZ, J AdejuyigbeZZ, V AjayiZ and M OnipedeY

Z Department of Microbiology, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria ZZ Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ilfe-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria Y Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria

The incidence of septicaemia among neonates categorized as being at high risk was 55 per cent in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Gram-positive organisms, specifically Staphylococcus aureus, were predominant (33.8 per cent) among bacteria cultured from proven cases of septicaemia. Other coagulase-negative staphylococci also contributed 21 per cent, with Staphylococcus epidermidis occurring in 5 per cent of the isolates. Listeria monocytogenes was cultured from 8.4 per cent of septic neonates. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was cultured from 3 per cent, Klebsiella pneumoniae from 14 per cent, and Escherichia coli from 7 per cent. Other Gram-negative bacilli cultured were Enterobacter aerogenes (5 per cent), Citrobacter freundii, Salmonella sp., and Proteus sp. (2 per cent each). The bacterial isolates were relatively resistant to antibiotics traditionally employed to treat cases of septicaemia. The study shows a high prevalence of neonatal bacterial sepsis at the centre and the emerging role of Listeria monocytogenes in the aetiology of neonatal sepsis. It highlights the preponderance of multiple antibiotic resistant organisms among these neonates early in life which is of epidemiological importance in the control of the infectious agents.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
S Vergnano, M Sharland, P Kazembe, C Mwansambo, and P T Heath
Neonatal sepsis: an international perspective
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2005; 90(3): F220 - f224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
S Ladhani, O S Konana, S Mwarumba, and M C English
Bacteraemia due to Staphylococcus aureus
Arch. Dis. Child., June 1, 2004; 89(6): 568 - 571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Med MicrobiolHome page
A. Jain, I. Roy, M. K. Gupta, M. Kumar, and S. K. Agarwal
Prevalence of extended-spectrum {beta}-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria in septicaemic neonates in a tertiary care hospital
J. Med. Microbiol., May 1, 2003; 52(5): 421 - 425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
S A Ali, T A Khan, and A K M Zaidi
Neonatal sepsis in Peshawar
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., November 1, 2002; 87(3): F233 - 233.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.