Skip Navigation

Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 1999 45(1):48-51; doi:10.1093/tropej/45.1.48
© 1999 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ronfani, L
Right arrow Articles by Cattaneo, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ronfani, L
Right arrow Articles by Cattaneo, A
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brief report. Signs of severe bacterial infection in neonates

L RonfaniA1,A2, JNA VilarimA3, D DragovichA2, AF BacalhauA3 and A CattaneoA2,Z

A1 Department of Pediatrics, and A2 Bureau for International Health, Istituto per l'Infanzia, 34137 Trieste, Italy A3 Department of Neonatology, Instituto Materno Infantilde Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil Z Corresponding author e-mail: bih@burlo.trieste.it

The objective of this study was to identify a short list of valid signs for the development of standard case management guidelines for severe bacterial infection (SBI) in newborn infants, an important cause of neonatal deaths in low-income countries. The reported and observed signs of 83 sick neonates admitted during 12 consecutive months were recorded. At discharge, 50 cases were classified, using predefined criteria, as SBI, mostly pneumonia, and 33 as other disease. The neonates with other diseases were significantly younger than those with SBI. None of the reported and observed signs, when used alone, had a high sensitivity, an important feature for a severe disease amenable to effective treatment. The best sensitivity (74 per cent) was obtained when a doctor observed severe chest indrawing or fast breathing or 'not looking well'; the specificity was 67 per cent and the positive predictive value 77 per cent. The sensitivity of reported difficult breathing and of observed severe chest indrawing, when measured only for the diagnosis of pneumonia, improved to 77 per cent, with a specificity of 84 per cent and 66 per cent, respectively. Reported fever and the observation that the neonate was 'not looking well' were the best independent predictors of SBI on logistic regression analysis. Simple standard case management (SCM) guidelines based only on reported and observed clinical signs would not identify the majority of neonates with SBI at primary health care level.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.