Skip Navigation

Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 1996 42(5):281-286; doi:10.1093/tropej/42.5.281
© 1996 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soliman, A. T.
Right arrow Articles by Khadir, M. M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soliman, A. T.
Right arrow Articles by Khadir, M. M. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


research-article

Growth Parameters and Predictors of Growth in Short Children With and Without Growth Hormone (GH) Deficiency Treated With Human GH: a Randomized Controlled Study

Ashraf T. Soliman, MD*, and M. M. Abdul Khadir, MD**

*Department of Pediatrics, University of Alexandria, School of Medicine Alexandria, Egypt
**Department of Medicine, University of Alexandria, School of Medicine Alexandria, Egypt

Correspondence: Dr Ashraf T. Soliman, Pediatric Endocrinology, Royal Hospital, P.O. Box 2331 Seeb, Muscat code 111, Oman

Seventy-seven prepubertal short children with heights below the third centile for age and gender were divided into three groups according to their peak GH response to clonidine and insulin provocation. Group (I) included 30 children with peak GH response <7 µg/l, group (II) included 19 children, with GH peak response between 7 and 10 µg/l, and group (III) included 24 children with GH peak >10 µg/l. Each group was divided into two subgroups, a and b. Subgroups (I)b, (II)a and (III)b were treated daily for 1 year with subcutaneous recombinant human growth hormone (GH) 15 U/m2/week, and group (I)a was treated with GH (30 U/m2/week). Before initiation of treatment, the chronological age, the height standard deviation score (HtSDS), and the bone age delay did not differ among the study subgroups. The height growth velocity (GV) and insulin-like growth factor-I concentrations were significantly higher in group (III), with normal GH response to provocation, compared to those for group (I) with GH deficiency. All the children had normal thyroid function and normal glucose tolerance. CT examination of the hypothalamic-pitiiitary area revealed a picture of empty sella (either partial or complete) in 35 per cent of the children in group (I) and 21 per cent of children in group (II). After 1 year of GH therapy, the HtSDS, GV, and IGF-I concentrations increased significantly in the four subgroups treated with GH compared to their pretreatment values and to their controls. All the children in group (I) were responders (increment in GV of 2 cm2/year above the pretreatment GV), of the nine subjects treated in group (II)a, one child was a non-responder and of the 12 children in group (III)a three children were non-responders. GV was non-significantly higher in group (I)a (30 U/m2/week) v. group (I)b (15 U/m2/week). GV of children in groups (I)b, with abnormal GH response to provocation, was significantly higher than GV of children in group (III)a. Bone age advanced by less than 1 year in the treated groups (0.84±0.14 years)v. the untreated groups (0.73±0.3 years). None of the children had impaired glucose tolerance or abnormal thyroid function after 1 year of GH therapy. In all the treated children, GV after 1 year of GH treatment was correlated significantly with the pretreatment GV (r=–0.63, P<0.01), peak GH response to provocation (r=–0.59, P<0.01), IGF-I concentration (r=–0.54, P<0.01), and positively with the GH dose (r=0.589, P<0.01). In group (III) children, with normal GH reserve, GV correlated significantly with the pretreatment GV (r=–0.48, P<0.01) and negatively with the GH peak response to provocation (r=–0.25, P<0.05).

In conclusion, GH therapy improved GV of children growing along or parallel to the 3rd centile, irrespective of their GH response to provocation, without untoward effect on skeletal maturation, thyroid function or glucose tolerance.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
K. L Weise and M. C Nahata
Growth Hormone Use in Children with Idiopathic Short Stature
Ann. Pharmacother., September 1, 2004; 38(9): 1460 - 1468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
B. S. Finkelstein, T. F. Imperiale, T. Speroff, U. Marrero, D. J. Radcliffe, and L. Cuttler
Effect of Growth Hormone Therapy on Height in Children With Idiopathic Short Stature: A Meta-analysis
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, March 1, 2002; 156(3): 230 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.