Skip Navigation

Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 1996 42(5):276-280; doi:10.1093/tropej/42.5.276
© 1996 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hijazi, Z.
Right arrow Articles by El-Salam, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hijazi, Z.
Right arrow Articles by El-Salam, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

research-article

Laboratory Diagnosis of Acute Lower Respiratory Tract Viral Infections in Children

Zeinat Hijazi, MRCP*, Alexander Pacsa, PhD**, Sahar Eisa, Msc**, Amani El Shazli, Bsc** and Randa Abd El-Salam, Msc*

*Department of Pediatrics, Mubarak Al-Kabeer Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University P.O. Box 24923, Safat, Kuwait
**Department of Microbiology, Mubarak Al-Kabeer Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University P.O. Box 24923, Safat, Kuwait

This report summarizes and compares the results of complement fixation test (CFT), virus isolation (VI), and direct immunofluorescence test (DIF) for the antigen detection of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), influenza A virus (Flu A), and adenovirus in 62 children with acute lower respiratory tract infections (ALRI) in Kuwait. It includes, as well, CFT results for parainfluenza virus and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Combining the three methods, a potential causative agent was identified in 56 (90 per cent) children, of whom 14 (22 per cent) had evidence of infection with more than one pathogen. RSV was most frequently identified followed by Flu A, parainfluenza, Mycoplasma pneumoniae and adenovirus. Virus isolation proved the best method for identification of RSV, Flu A, and adenovirus [identified 52 (84 per cent) cases]. DIF was sensitive for RSV detection (sensitivity 84 per cent, specificity 94 per cent), and less sensitive for Flu A (sensitivity 62 per cent, specificity 98 per cent). However, DIF was completely insensitive to adenovirus (no positives). CFT was positive for the five pathogens in 44 (71 per cent) of the population studied; therefore, almost 20 per cent of positive identifications would have been missed if VI and DIF were not done. The sensitivity and specificity of CFT for RSV, adenovirus and Flu A were 71, 75, and 31 per cent, and 94, 96, and 94 per cent, respectively. Based on the results of this pilot study, it appears that a combination of the three tests yields the best rate of virus detection. Cell culture cannot be discarded for the identification of some respiratory viruses, especially adenovirus, until better techniques, or more sensitive reagents are applied. However, since RSV is the virus most commonly involved in children with ALRI, we recommend using DIF on routine basis for diagnosis. Its results compare well with virus isolation; it is simple, rapid, and inexpensive.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
M. S. Rajala, W. M. Sullender, A. K. Prasad, L. Dar, and S. Broor
Genetic Variability among Group A and B Respiratory Syncytial Virus Isolates from a Large Referral Hospital in New Delhi, India
J. Clin. Microbiol., June 1, 2003; 41(6): 2311 - 2316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.