Skip Navigation

Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 1996 42(3):162-165; doi:10.1093/tropej/42.3.162
© 1996 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (57)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pant, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hart, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pant, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hart, C. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


research-article

Lactobacillus GG and Acute Diarrhoea in Young Children in the Tropics

A. R. Pant, MB BS*, S. M. Graham, FRACP*,, S. J. Allen, MD, MRCP*, S. Harikul, MD**, A. Sabchareon, MD**, L. Cuevas*, M Trop Med and C. A. Hart, FRCPath***

*Tropical Child Health Group, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine Liverpool, UK
**Department of Tropical Pediatrics, Mahidol University Bangkok, Thailand
***Medical Microbiology, University of Liverpool Liverpool, UK

Correspondence: Dr S. M. Graham, Tropical Child Health Group, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK

A prospective, placebo controlled, triple blind clinical trial was undertaken in Thailand to determine the effect of Lactobacillus GG on recovery from acute diarrhoea in children. Thirty-nine children (mean age=8 months) were enrolled and following rehydration received either oral Lactobacillus GG (n=20) as a freeze-dried preparation or placebo (n=19) twice daily for 2 days. The clinical characteristics of the study groups were similar. There was no significant difference overall in clinical response detected between the study groups. When only those with acute non-bloody diarrhoea (n=26) were considered, the mean duration of diarrhoea was significantly shorter in the lactobacillus group (1.9 days) than in the placebo group (3.3 days) (P<0.055). Stool frequency was less on the second day in the lactobacillus group (P<0.05). The results suggest thatLactobacillus GG accelerates recovery from acute watery diarrhoea in young children in a tropical setting.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
W Sharieff, Z Bhutta, C Schauer, G Tomlinson, and S Zlotkin
Micronutrients (including zinc) reduce diarrhoea in children: The Pakistan Sprinkles Diarrhoea Study
Arch. Dis. Child., July 1, 2006; 91(7): 573 - 579.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
E Isolauri, P V Kirjavainen, and S Salminen
Probiotics: a role in the treatment of intestinal infection and inflammation?
Gut, May 1, 2002; 50(90003): iii54 - 59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
P. R Marteau, M. d. Vrese, C. J Cellier, and J. Schrezenmeir
Protection from gastrointestinal diseases with the use of probiotics
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2001; 73(2): 430S - 436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Med.Home page
S. Awasthi
Lactobacillus GG reduced diarrhoea incidence in children treated with antibiotics
Evid. Based Med., July 1, 2000; 5(4): 113 - 113.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
M. Heyman
Effect of Lactic Acid Bacteria on Diarrheal Diseases
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., April 1, 2000; 19(90002): 137S - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
N. M de Roos and M. B Katan
Effects of probiotic bacteria on diarrhea, lipid metabolism, and carcinogenesis: a review of papers published between 1988 and 19981
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2000; 71(2): 405 - 411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.