Skip Navigation

Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 1995 41(2):120-122; doi:10.1093/tropej/41.2.120
© 1995 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Potur, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kalmaz, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Potur, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kalmaz, N.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

brief-report

An Investigation into Feeding Errors of 0–4-month-old Infants

Ayse H. Potur and Nahide Kalmaz

Department of Pediatrics, Zeynep Kamil Hospital Istanbul, Turkey

Correspondence: Dr Ayse H. Potur, Sehit Bahadir Demir sokak, Dilek apt. no. 8/6 Maltepe, Ankara, Turkey.

This study was carried out on 206 infants seen consecutively at the Pediatric Clinic of our hospital. The feeding errors investigated were: the proportion of infants not exclusively breast-fed, incorrect dilution of formula milk, incorrect dilution of cow's milk, rice flour feed prepared with water, and the use of rice water as a feed. The feeding methods of the infants were compared with their weight for height. Of those infants exclusively breastfed 83 per cent were found to be above 100 per cent as regards weight-for-beight. In those receiving supplementary feeds this ratio was significantly lower (P<0.05). In 20 per cent of cases where the infant bad received formula milk and in 14 per cent of cases where the infant had received cow's milk, the milk was found to be overdiluted by more than 40 per cent.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.