Skip Navigation

Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 1993 39(6):368-369; doi:10.1093/tropej/39.6.368
© 1993 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prasad, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prasad, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


brief-report

Rice-based Oral Rehydration Solution: A Controlled Trial in Nepal

B. Prasad, MBBS, M.Sc.(Lond.)

Eastern Region Hospital Ghopa Dharan, Nepal

Correspondence: B. Prasad, Centre for International Child Health, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK

The efficacy of rice-based (50 g/l) oral rehydration solution (ORS) was compared with standard glucose ORS in a randomized controlled trial in 148 children under 5 years of age, suffering from acute watery diarrhoea leading to moderate and severe dehydration. The mean ORS intake in the two groups of children were 141.6 and 205.2 ml/kg/24 hours, for rice ORS and glucose ORS, respectively (P <0.001). The mean number of diarrhoeal stools in the first 24 hours in children of the rice ORS group was less when compared with the glucose ORS group (5.4 and 6.8/24 hours, respectively; P <0.001). This study suggests that rice ORS is a better alternative to standard glucose ORS in the management of diarrhoeal diseases in children.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.