Skip Navigation

Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 1993 39(1):32-36; doi:10.1093/tropej/39.1.32
© 1993 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


research-article

Epidemiology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

A. K. Gupta*,, Shiv Shashi*, Man Mohan*, I. M. S. Lamba** and R. Gupta***

*Neonatal Division New Delhi—110029, India
**Institute for Research in Medical Statistics (ICMR) New Delhi—110029, India
***Department of Microbiology, Safdarjang Hospital New Delhi—110029, India

Correspondence: Dr A. K. Gupta, 151, Shakti Vihar, Near Rani Bagh, Delhi-110034, India

During the 19-month study period, 48 (2 per cent) of the 2177 neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) yielded Pseudomonas aeruginosa growths in blood cultures. All these neonates had clinical and haematological evidences of sepsis. Prominent clinical features included sclerema, violaceus necrotic patches, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), conjugated hyperbilirubinaemia, and DIC. Over all mortality was 23 per cent, distinctly higher in premature neonates with RDS.

The mean gestational age and birth weights (±SD) of these neonates were 36.42 (±2.73) weeks and 2173.34 (±567.33) g, respectively. Approximately half of the total cases had low birth weight. Other adverse perinatal events before the development of sepsis included birth asphyxia (60 per cent), neonatal resuscitation (67 per cent), meconium aspiration syndrome (29 per cent), hyaline membrane disease (8 per cent), prolonged hospitalization (44 per cent), closed incubator care (17 per cent), prolonged intravenous fluids (42 per cent), repeated blood sampling (63 per cent), and umbilical catheterization (4 per cent).

Analysis of the trend of Pseudomonas sepsis in our NICU revealed six definite outbreaks (more than two cases) interspersed with occasional (one or two) cases. Six study months, however, remained free of Pseudomonas sepsis. Index case was demonstrable on seven occasions. Bacteriological surveillance of the NICU after onset of initial case/cases revealed statistically significant colonization of resuscitation equipment, baby placement sites, and various cleansing solutions by the same bacterial species (P<0.05).

It is possible that Pseudomonas was introduced to our NICU from transfer admissions from other hospitals since on four occasions index case was the one transferred from outside. Measures such as closing the nursery (if more than two cases), cohorting (more than one case), strict hand washing, and removal of contaminated NICU equipment and cleansing solutions limited the spread of infection to only 0–8 of the 25–30 babies admitted.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. Foca, K. Jakob, S. Whittier, P. D. Latta, S. Factor, D. Rubenstein, and L. Saiman
Endemic Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
N. Engl. J. Med., September 7, 2000; 343(10): 695 - 700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.