© 1991 by Oxford University Press
research-article |
Are International Anthropometric Standards Appropriate for Developing Countries?
* Department of Chemical Technology, Papua New Guinea University of Technology
** Department of Food and Nutrition Sciences, King's College, The University of London
***Department of Applied Physics, Papua New Guinea University of Technology
Correspondence: F. Kow, School of Fisheries, Australian Maritime College, P.O. Box 21, Beaconsfield, Tasmania 7251 Australia
To test the validity of using international standards as references for the assessment of nutritional status, investigations have been carried out on pre-school aged children selected from three distinct ecological environments in Papua New Guinea. Field work included anthropometric measurements (weight, height, triceps skin-fold, mid-upper-arm circumference, mid-upper-arm muscle circumference), together with pathological and clinical assessments (intestinal helminths, diarrhoea, splenomegaly, PEM signs).
The findings indicate that any deviation below standard weight, height, and arm circumference is associated with greater prevalence of disease. International standards are therefore appropriate for preschool aged children in Papua New Guinea and by inference in other developing countries.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. N. Al-Isa and L. Thalib Body mass index of Kuwaiti children aged 3-9 years: reference percentiles and curves The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, January 1, 2006; 126(1): 41 - 46. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
