Skip Navigation

Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 1988 34(6):275-281; doi:10.1093/tropej/34.6.275
© 1988 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yost, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pust, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yost, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pust, R. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


research-article

Arm Circumference as an Index of Protein-Energy Malnutrition in Six- to Eleven-Month Old Rural Tanzanian Children

David A. Yost, MD and Ronald E. Pust, MD

Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine Tucson, Arizona

The use of arm circumference (AC) as an inexpensive indicator of protein-energy malnutrition (PEM) has been largely confined to children 12–59 months old. In this age range, AC has been shown to be relatively age-independent and highly correlated with traditional weight-for-age (W/A) indices. We analysed AC for these two properties in this anthropometric survey of rural Tanzanian children 6–11 months (n = 85) and 12–59 months (n =123) old. We compared W/A to NCHS 50th percentile standards and AC to Wolanski standards. AC cut-offs tested included a 13.5-cm mark for both age groups and 12.5 cm for those 6–11 months. The correlation between AC and W/A was 0.8214 in the 6–11-month group and 0.6771 for the 12–59-month age range. Using a W/A standard and a 13.5-cm cut off, AC had a sensitivity of 88 per cent and specificity of 57 per cent in the 6–11-month group, and respective values of 69 and 76 per cent in the 12–59-month group. In those 6–11 months old, sensitivity fell to 79 per cent and specificity rose to 95 per cent with a 12.5-cm cut off. In Wolanski's AC data, AC increased 10 per cent from 6 to 11 months (1.7 per cent/rath) and 8 per cent from 12 to 59 months (0.17 per cent/mth). Thus, despite the greater rate of AC increase in the first year of life, the absolute increase is small enough that, for the vulnerable 6–11-month age group in this region of Tanzania, a 12.5-cm cut off identifies PEM with high specificity and appropriate sensitivity to promote early intervention at the village level.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.